Customer Support 7 days a week

Welcome Guest! You can not login or register.

Notification

Icon
Error

4 Pages<1234>
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
bluefitness  
#21 Posted : Monday, December 27, 2010 7:14:41 PM(UTC)
bluefitness

Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 10/28/2008(UTC)
Posts: 75

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Originally Posted by: richappy Go to Quoted Post
For some reason you are on this forum supporting a device designed for higher hp compressors that can survive thermal and high inrush conditions. I have proved, these devices will cause the newer fractional compressors to fail. You have not shown any engineering proof that I am wrong.
Otherwise, I would like you to stop making all this trouble on this forum.


The devices I am referring to are rated and designed for 1/12 to 1/5 hp compressors. Where is your proof? The link you posted earlier was blocked out. I noticed you couldn't answer a single question by the way. I would like to see how exactly your study was conducted. I think you had a single compressor fail and blamed it on the 3 n 1. It could have failed if an OEM starting device was installed. You could have wired it wrong as well. Maybe, you reversed the run and start windings. You should have used your ohm meter to check the resistance to determine the terminal placement prior to using this device. You could have figured out the run, start, and common terminals. I do not wish to carry on with this discussion either, but I haven't seen any "engineering proof" yet. If you have some data, please provide it. I'm sure the world that you suggest is reading this thread and the class action lawyers are waiting in anticipation. Otherwise, you should give the 3 n 1 (proper size) another try and stop bashing them. Just because you had one fail does not mean there is a 100 percent compressor failure rate with these devices.
richappy  
#22 Posted : Tuesday, December 28, 2010 12:49:37 AM(UTC)
richappy

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Senior Expert
Joined: 9/10/2007(UTC)
Posts: 9,586

Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
You are coming into this forum supporting a device that nobody here wants to use. Just stop your comments, you are disruptive.
bluefitness  
#23 Posted : Tuesday, December 28, 2010 6:40:03 AM(UTC)
bluefitness

Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 10/28/2008(UTC)
Posts: 75

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Originally Posted by: richappy Go to Quoted Post
You are coming into this forum supporting a device that nobody here wants to use. Just stop your comments, you are disruptive.


I didn't think you had any engineering proof or evidence. You never conducted an engineering analysis or study. It is just your opinion, based on limited experience, that these cause premature compressor failure. Until I have a greater than 1 percent failure rate, I will still use a product that has worked time and time again for the last 10 plus years. Your argument is too weak to continue on with this discussion. Let me know if you find any real data on this subject. I am truly interested in looking at some unbiased data. Have a good day. Thank you
magician59  
#24 Posted : Tuesday, December 28, 2010 8:59:16 AM(UTC)
magician59

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Senior Expert
Joined: 8/16/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,273

I have one attached to a compressor test cord. I also have heard that they can cause problems. The closest I have come is when I was just beginning as a repair tech, and I installed one incorrectly. The compressor ran continuously for several days without stopping. It was too hot to touch when I got the call back. I'm sure glad it didn't cause a fire.
richappy  
#25 Posted : Tuesday, December 28, 2010 1:21:56 PM(UTC)
richappy

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Senior Expert
Joined: 9/10/2007(UTC)
Posts: 9,586

Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
That probably was an R12 compressor, they can handle screw ups like that.
A major problem with these is they have to work over a rather large current range so they have no klixon to open fast when there is an overload, and remain open for a few minutes to let the windings cool down. A 3 n 1 will just sit there and feed current and get very hot.
For your info, I just updated my article "replacing compressor start devices" with specific directions to replace the klixon and start device. Turned out to be more difficult as not all start devices are wired the same.
denny409  
#26 Posted : Sunday, September 18, 2011 12:09:41 PM(UTC)
denny409

Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 9/18/2011(UTC)
Posts: 2

Originally Posted by: richappy Go to Quoted Post
That probably was an R12 compressor, they can handle screw ups like that.
A major problem with these is they have to work over a rather large current range so they have no klixon to open fast when there is an overload, and remain open for a few minutes to let the windings cool down. A 3 n 1 will just sit there and feed current and get very hot.
For your info, I just updated my article "replacing compressor start devices" with specific directions to replace the klixon and start device. Turned out to be more difficult as not all start devices are wired the same.


I used them mainly on old R-12 models with no problems. One thing I always due as part of the install is to test the overload by creating a hard start condition. I let the unit run long enough to build up some high side pressure, then shut it off and start it back up within 10 seconds. If the unit starts right up, which some really old units will do, then it's not a real test, but is usually OK if you know these units reacted the same way with the OEM relays. If it hums for maybe 3 to 10 seconds before clicking off, I assume the protection is functional... if it is much longer I begin to question the overload's rating. This only happened once on a newer R134-A, where it took about 15 seconds to trip. I was able to find an OEM type part and removed the 3-in 1 just to be cautious, even though it ran fine for a week and a half. The overload trip reset period seems long enough on all cases to let head pressure drop enough to start back up. But since newer compressors draw much less current, even in a rotor lock condition, it is VERY, very important to know that the overload will indeed protect you should the compressor fail to start for any reason. Lastly, I would use a surge suppressor on any fridge nowadays, old ones since they are rare and collectible, any time you use a generic replacement part, and on newer fridges and freezers since they have other electronics that are easily damaged by power surges.
richappy  
#27 Posted : Sunday, September 18, 2011 2:22:01 PM(UTC)
richappy

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Senior Expert
Joined: 9/10/2007(UTC)
Posts: 9,586

Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
I have reported in the past that these hard start devices do not protect the compressor from thermal overloads, substation voltage surges, and re-start conditions. Either the unit will just supply high current just below it's rather high trip limit, cause thermal damage to the compressor, and in some cases catch on fire. The surge protector will not help in these conditions, it clips the peaks of the voltage spikes, but retains the valleys.
If you have some technical evidence these items are safe to use, please tell us. They are safe to use in the old high hp compressors, but not in the new high efficiency ones.
I have obtained a good scope and will soon do some pulse response tests as soon as I can get a R134A compressor.
These tests should prove my calculations that instead of just a blown ptc device/and, or damaged start winding, the greatly enhanced transient response of the hard start kit will cause the compressor windings to explode and short to the compressor housing, thus causing an additional fire hazard.
puke  
#28 Posted : Sunday, November 27, 2011 7:39:03 AM(UTC)
puke

Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 11/27/2011(UTC)
Posts: 1

Originally Posted by: richappy Go to Quoted Post
I have reported in the past that these hard start devices do not protect the compressor from thermal overloads, substation voltage surges, and re-start conditions. Either the unit will just supply high current just below it's rather high trip limit, cause thermal damage to the compressor, and in some cases catch on fire. The surge protector will not help in these conditions, it clips the peaks of the voltage spikes, but retains the valleys.
If you have some technical evidence these items are safe to use, please tell us. They are safe to use in the old high hp compressors, but not in the new high efficiency ones.
I have obtained a good scope and will soon do some pulse response tests as soon as I can get a R134A compressor.
These tests should prove my calculations that instead of just a blown ptc device/and, or damaged start winding, the greatly enhanced transient response of the hard start kit will cause the compressor windings to explode and short to the compressor housing, thus causing an additional fire hazard.





A couple of things I see missing in all these posts. I think I've read all of them,...I need to learn something new each day that I didn't know the day before,...as should everybody else.

1) It has LONG been acknowledged that R134 has it's own set of problems, proven in the automotive industry when they switched over. R134 itself is anything but benign to components in your closed system WHEN COMPARED TO R12. Not necesssarily the refrigerant,..but the impurities they will carry.
Having said that,..and knowing that the big 3 went ahead with it KNOWING that once a unit was opened, there was a VERY good chance it would not make it to 6 months,...vac for 3 minutes or 3 weeks,..they knew it, and later on, everybody else knew they knew it..if they bothered to check.
2) Are appliance companies more benevolent? Are they even about to tell you that if something is "iffy" in a 134 system,...you are going to fail much sooner than an R12 system? I suspect they don't know and don't care. If they even cared ever so slightly about their engineering,,,wouldn't they have a self resetting plug-in fuse in an easy to get to place...rather than calling it an overload and sticking it under the haystack (of course,...that does incrrease employment for techs)? Gee,. something that would not go obsolete???? Isn't that strange,...and I suspect even an aerospace grade one is cheaper than most overload switches. I've never met anyone who could tell me a difference that mattered. Maybe one of you guys can. Overload switches and self-resetting breakers, etc.,..are not something that are covered much in my elec. engineering books.
3) The start kit does not increase your voltage from 110 to a higher voltage, ..which would be required if you wanted to push more current through your windings,......it would need to increase that voltage if you ever expected to win a lawsuit. I believe it keeps your voltage from dropping during startup.Unless something is "sick" in there anyway,...keeping your voltage up equals keeping your current draw where it belongs. Gee....not a bad idea,..unless something is already on it's way out. Then it's neither good nor bad,..it's just on it's way out and you may not know it...and you've spend time and money on a 3 in one finding out.

I did read one post that mentioned that R134 is more efficient than R12. I believe you are probably referring to todays systems as a complete unit,..and not the R12 itself.
I won't even touch that except to say...."if you are only doing it because your government requires it.....you may want to rethink your theory", your chances are pretty poor when the free market didn't think they could make a better unit with something else....until the govt. told them too.

One more thing (I think someone mentioned in one of these posts about start relays themselves), my understanding (I've never took a die grinder and cut one in half to look at,..so this is from reading,..and probably NOT from a textbook,..I don't know where I read it), is that a start relay for a fridge compressor is not a relay like most people think of when you state the term "relay". But more like a fuse that cuts the circuit to the start winding after the "start windings" part of the relay have current through them for a couple seconds.

Gotta go.
richappy  
#29 Posted : Sunday, November 27, 2011 8:38:04 AM(UTC)
richappy

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Senior Expert
Joined: 9/10/2007(UTC)
Posts: 9,586

Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
The 3 n 1 hard start kit contains a large capacitor that increases the start current and phase shifts the current to achieve greater than 60 % boost in starting torque. The problem with these units is they eventually will blow out the compressor windings and damage any electronic module in the fridg. The overload on these cuts out around 30 amps where most of the klixon overloads trip out at 20 amps, thus they provide very poor overload protection and have caused house fires when the compressor fails usually in a locked rotor condition.
They may be used on damaged compressors that may have partially burnt or shorted windings which enhances the probability of failing catastrophically.
Your coments on R134A are interesting and would like to learn more.
jerdal68  
#30 Posted : Wednesday, September 24, 2014 6:51:53 AM(UTC)
jerdal68

Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 9/24/2014(UTC)
Posts: 1

Read this thread hoping someone was going to answer the original question and what i got was "NO! Why? Cuz I'm start and you're dumb.
Users browsing this topic
Guest (5)
4 Pages<1234>
Forum Jump  
You can post new topics in this forum.
You can reply to topics in this forum.
You can delete your posts in this forum.
You can edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You can vote in polls in this forum.